The Speaker of the House of Commons has rejected an SNP bid for an emergency debate on a ceasefire in Gaza.
Sir Linsday Hoyle said there was no need as the UK government was making a "relevant statement" in the Parliament on Tuesday and there would be a "very imminent opportunity" for MPs to make their views known.
Stephen Flynn, the SNP's Westminster leader, accused the Speaker of breaking his word.
READ MORE: SNP call for vote of no confidence in Speaker
Last Wednesday's debate on an SNP motion calling for an immediate ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war ended in chaos after Sir Lindsay, following a tense meeting with Sir Keir Starmer, broke with convention and allowed a Labour amendment to be debated and voted on, despite warnings from his clerk.
The SNP said that had ultimately turned their opposition day into a Labour opposition day.
Sir Lindsay apologised the next day, and said he had made a mistake.
He told the Commons: “I would say that we can have an SO24 (Standing Order 24) to get an immediate debate because the debate is so important to this House."
However, when Mr Flynn applied for that debate today, the Speaker said it would not proceed.
The decision will add to the pressure on Sir Lindsay. At the time of writing, 80 MPs, including 36 from the SNP, have signed an early day motion expressing no confidence in the Speaker.
Raising a point of order in the Commons, Mr Flynn said that in "good faith" he and his colleagues had "sought to bring forward an SO24 debate which would have, amongst other things, sought to end the sales of arms to Israel and indeed to ensure that this House said to the Government that it must use its voice at the United Nations to exercise our view in favour of an immediate ceasefire.”
However, Sir Lindsay said that he understood the UK Government was "ready to make a relevant statement tomorrow so there is a very imminent opportunity for this important matter to come before the House."
He added: “That is why I have decided the application for an emergency debate should not proceed. That decision, of course, does not mean that members cannot apply for a debate at a later stage when circumstances might have changed.
“Whilst the decision is mine to take, I have consulted the deputies on this matter and the clerks and we have agreed on this approach.”
READ MORE: Flynn calls for probe into Speaker's meeting with Starmer
Speaking after the answer, Mr Flynn said the "inexplicable decision will further erode trust in the Speaker."
He added: "The Speaker broke the rules last week - and this week he has broken his word. How can MPs have any trust in the Speaker when he makes a public commitment one minute, only to rip it up the next. If 30,000 dead Palestinians aren't worthy of an emergency debate - what is?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel