A woman has questioned why her husband who died from Covid-19 was not put into the shielding category despite having type two diabetes, and while she was receiving treatment for breast cancer.
Speaking as the Scottish Covid Inquiry resumed on Tuesday for the first time since December, Sharon Boswell of Scottish Covid Bereaved said her husband George died on February 9, 2021.
She told Stuart Gale KC, co-lead counsel to the inquiry, that his cause of death was listed as Covid-19, with complications due to his diabetes, which led to multiple organ failure.
He also contracted a fungal infection while in hospital, which she says was the "final straw" that led to his death.
She had been with her husband, who died aged 52, since they were teenagers and she described him as "generous to a fault" and family oriented.
READ MORE:
- Was lockdown avoidable? Yes - if we had 'followed the science'
- Five key exchanges from Nicola Sturgeon's evidence to UK Covid inquiry
- ANALYSIS: Humza Yousaf at the UK Covid inquiry
He worked as a delivery driver for DHL and Mrs Boswell told the inquiry the firm "did not have his best interests in mind" as he was not allowed to stay at home and help her as she underwent treatment.
She was diagnosed with breast cancer shortly before the UK entered lockdown and soon began chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
She was placed into the shielding category due to her illness, but her husband was not and was required to go to work as normal, despite having diabetes.
She told the inquiry she believes he contracted Covid-19 from a colleague who had told her husband he had the virus, but not their employer.
Her husband's Covid-19 symptoms initially included a very sore back, lethargy and a loss of appetite, but he did not have a cough or any other typical signs of the illness.
He worsened and was admitted to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.
Mrs Boswell said: "By this point he had deteriorated so much that he'd been put on dialysis for his kidneys, he had had two chest drains inserted in his left side."
Mr Gale asked her if her husband should have been on the shielding list. She replied: "Yes."
He then asked: "If he had been on the shielding list, it may be obvious, but what difference would that have made to your daily life?"
She said: "I would have had more time with him for sure. I think that he would have been at home to take care of me as well, because it was so difficult going through chemotherapy when he was at work.
"I remember one night after I got my diagnosis and he knew that he had to go to work after I was getting my chemotherapy, and I heard him crying upstairs because he was scared.
"He was scared that Covid would kill me. Little did we think it would be the other way around.
"We never thought - we were young, we didn't have health issues or such, no lung problems.
"Nothing, no signs that this was going to happen."
She added she was particularly angry about the UK Government's "partygate" scandal, saying: "To know that they were being so disrespectful while my husband was in hospital dying.
"My best friend was in hospital as well and she was very ill as well.
"They're disregarding every lockdown rule so they could have a party here and there."
She said she also wants to know why essential workers like her husband were not included in the first vaccine rollout.
"Obviously it leaves me with questions as to if he had had his first immunisation, would it have turned out differently?"
The inquiry, before Lord Brailsford, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here