Environmental campaigners have criticised national and local politicians for spending millions of taxpayer’s cash generated by City Region Deals on roads.
In a new report, Dirty Deals, Transform Scotland found that around £920m, just over 70% of all money being spent on transport by the country's six deals was on "high carbon" projects.
They described this as “a vast misallocation” of public cash and warned it risked “embedding high carbon transport for years to come.”
The group are demanding a Parliamentary inquiry and an immediate halt to new road schemes.
READ MORE: Edinburgh houses plan by Forth Ports at Leith port
City Region Deals are packages of funding agreed between the Scottish and UK governments to bring about “long-term strategic approaches to improving regional economies.”
At their core, the agreements are supposed to “support economic growth, create jobs or invest in local projects.”
In their report, Transform analysed the deals in Scotland, Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Inverness, Stirling, and the Tay Cities - Dundee and Perth.
Collectively, the deals for the six cities incorporate £4.6bn of spending, including £1.3bn allocated to transport infrastructure.
The report lists high carbon projects including the £151m Cross Tay Link Road near Perth and a new £107m roundabout at Sheriffhall, Edinburgh.
It also points to work on the A9 and A96 and a £25m new road access to Aberdeen South Harbour and a £10m Dundee Airport investment.
Transform say just one of the City Region Deals commits all of its spending to low carbon transport while another two commit all transport spending to unsustainable high carbon projects.
The group has also criticised the “opaque” way thattrhe deals are currently managed. They said that many key spending figures were “difficult to obtain and in some cases not available at all.“
“It is unacceptable that for projects which are spending millions of pounds of public money, no data on the overall projected spend is available, and the lack of clarity prevents public scrutiny by elected members,” the report added.
Transform Scotland director Colin Howden said: "The City Deals provided an opportunity for transformational investment in transport in our cities, but local and national politicians have instead blown the cash on a new round of road-building that will inevitably generate more traffic and higher emissions.
"These politicians could have decided to reduce inequalities by investing in public transport and in our streets, but instead they decided to worsen inequalities and increase climate emissions by spending public funds on schemes that will further benefit the more affluent.
"We’re fed up with Scotland's political class mouthing empty platitudes about ‘net zero’ and ‘anti-poverty’ yet decade after decade making deliberate decisions to build new infrastructure that makes the country’s climate failure more and more certain, and neglects to provide fairer access to transport for the country’s poorest."
READ MORE: Motorcyclist dies after crash on A96 in Aberdeenshire
Green MSP Mark Ruskell said: "The Scottish Greens have long been critical of the City-Regional Deal models and their focus on costly high carbon transport projects that were designed for a different era.
"Far too many of the deals have roads at the heart of them, with projects like the Sherrifhall Roundabout that are designed for ever-increasing traffic at a time when we badly need to be cutting the number of journeys we are making in cars.
"Some of these projects clearly need to be reconsidered, especially in light of this data and the worsening climate crisis. We should be investing in high quality public transport and infrastructure that will help us to cut emissions.
"Our cities must be accessible, liveable and sustainable. That cannot happen if we are ploughing ever greater sums into polluting projects."
The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel