Find, save and share Public Notices that affect you.
Search the Public Notice Portal What is the Public Notice Portal?What is the Public Notice Portal?
The Public Notice Portal carries statutory public notices published in local newspapers and is the fastest and most effective way of finding out what is happening in YOUR neighbourhood.
Search the Public Notice PortalControversial plans to build a golf course on protected coastal land in the Highlands have been rejected by Scottish ministers.
Charities opposed to the development of the 18-hole course at Coul Links near Dornoch, about 45 miles north of Inverness, have welcomed ministers’ decision to reject the planning application on ecological grounds.
In 2023, Highland Council gave planning permission to Communities for Coul for the project, even though the land has been designated as part of a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
However, the decision to grant permission was called in by ministers in 2024.
Scottish ministers refused to grant permission for a golf course on the same site in 2020.
A coalition of charities had opposed the plans.
READ MORE:
Scottish Ministers 'set to refuse' controversial golf course plan
Coul Links. Do we need another golf course on rare dunes?
In the shadow of Trump. Coul Links golf course controversy
Jo Pike, chief executive of the Scottish Wildlife Trust, said: “We’re pleased that Scottish Government ministers have listened to the public inquiry’s recommendation, and to the thousands of people who spoke up for nature at Coul Links. Thank you to everyone who supported this cause.
“Going forward, it is essential that designations such as those at Coul Links are used to quickly assess when a site is unsuitable for development.”
Duncan Orr-Ewing, director of RSPB Scotland, said: “We are relieved and uplifted at today’s decision by ministers which recognises the incredible importance of Coul Links, a view shared by thousands of people across the UK.
“It is a very special place for nature and allowing this development would have damaged it beyond repair.
“This is the second time that thousands of people have said this is not the right location for a golf course and the second time ministers have refused permission following recommendations from a public inquiry.
“We hope developers will now realise that this type of damaging proposal, that goes against planning policy and harms protected sites, will not be accepted.”
The group behind the East Sutherland proposals said there are unlikely to be further attempts to develop the site.
Communities for Coul director, Gordon Sutherland, said: “The ministers’ decision to reject our application for planning permission is a real blow for our area’s economy and its unique environment and a slap in the face for local democracy.
“It will be hugely disappointing and dispiriting for all the many people in East Sutherland that have supported our proposals from the outset.
“Our plans offered a real opportunity to restore and sustainably protect the Coul Links site, while also creating lasting economic benefits and new employment opportunities in an area that is being decimated by the continuing loss of working-age population.
“We do not envisage that this opportunity will present itself again.”
Share