London Fire Brigade believe a family of five who escaped from a blaze at their home in Norbury on Friday morning may have been saved by their pet dog.
Twenty firemen fought to put out the flames which destroyed the whole of the roof and 25 per cent of the first floor of the semi-detached house in Kingslyn Crescent.
Five adults, including two teenagers who were treated at Mayday Hospital, for burns, and a baby, fled from the house at about 6.06am, after they were woken by their dogs barking and whining.
Station Officer James Drewitt, who was called to the scene from Norbury Fire Station, believed the family was extremely lucky.
He said: Thank goodness for the dog.
There was no smoke alarm fitted so if it werent for the dog, it could well have been a very different story.
The dog is believed to have escaped unharmed.
A spokeswoman for London Fire Brigade said it was not known whether the two people who were burned had been trying to put out the fire.
Seventy-five per cent of the roof had already been ravaged by the time firefighters arrived.
She added: Firefighters were concerned the flames would spread to the other half of the house but managed to prevent damage next door.
The fire was out by 7.06am.
She said an initial inspection did not point towards anything suspicious.
But firecrews struggled to get to the burning house because cars were badly parked along the narrow road.
London Fire Brigade said in London so far this year five people have died in house
fires.
None of those properties was fitted with smoke alarms.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article