More than £2.3million has been donated by the public to fund legal cases in Scotland, according to new figures.
The first study into the phenomenon of litigation crowdfunding reveals almost 78,000 people have donated cash to support cases through the Scottish courts.
Dr Andrew Tickell, lecturer in law at Glasgow Caledonian University, analysed more than five years’ worth of donations as part of the study, which has been published in the Edinburgh Law Review.
The People’s Action on Section 30 campaign raised the greatest sum through crowdfunding in Scottish legal history so far.
Pro-independence activist Martin Keatings secured donations of more than £268,000 from more than 9,900 people towards his case against the Advocate General for Scotland that a hypothetical independence referendum Bill would fall within Holyrood’s legislative powers.
In 2019, £207,970 was raised to challenge the lawfulness of Boris Johnson’s prorogation of Parliament in the Court of Session, culminating in a UK Supreme Court judgment.
And former First Minister Alex Salmond raised just over £100,000 to launch a judicial review of Scottish Government decision-making during an investigation into allegations of sexual harassment against him.
The 10 highest-value Scottish crowdfunding campaigns raised a total of £1,624,253 from 65,428 people.
Dr Tickell said: "Crowdfunded litigation is in rude health in Scotland, raising substantial sums of money from large numbers of people to support legal actions in this jurisdiction.
"Many of the highest-value Scottish campaigns involved litigants mobilising their already significant political and social capital."
Half of all litigation appeals raised less than £10,000 (47%), and almost three quarters received contributions from fewer than 1000 people (72%).
In total, 63 crowdfunding campaigns, launched between January 2015 to August 2021, raised £2,349,054 in cash.
Figures show 46% of crowdfunding appeals involved some kind of judicial review proceedings, 13% were for defence funds for criminal charges or contempt of court, and 9.5% related to defamation cases.
The remainder covered an array of proceedings, including fatal accident inquiries, debt recovery, immigration and eviction challenges, employment tribunal cases, and divorce actions.
Dr Tickell said: "Litigation crowdfunding has established itself as a viable way of financing court actions in Scotland during the last five years.
"The data suggests the success of particular crowdfunders is more obviously attributable to the crowd’s pre-existing political sympathies, antipathies and affiliations, and the emotion and affect which can be stirred by the successful mobilisation of existing online networks."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here