The son of a couple who died more than two decades ago has lost a legal bid to prevent the council arranging their burials.
Melvyn Marcel appealed against a judge's decision earlier this year granting Edinburgh City Council the authority to bury Eugenois and Hilda Marcel after their son made no arrangements to do so, keeping their remains at a property in Edinburgh for several years.
Hilda Marcel died on February 10, 1987 aged 68 while Eugenois died on August 31, 1994 aged 91.
Court of Session judges rejected Mr Marcel's appeal on Friday, a Judicial Office spokesman said.
In May 2002, police investigating another matter discovered the couple had not been buried but were stored in their son Melvyn's premises at Gilmour Place.
The embalmed bodies were moved to the city mortuary, where they were then stored.
Prosecutors were told of the discoveries but no proceedings were brought and the procurator fiscal said the bodies could be released for burial or cremation.
Edinburgh City Council has been discussing the burial of the couple with Mr Marcel since 2012 but applied for permission to bury them after he made no arrangements to do so.
In his written judgment in February, Lord Mulholland said the council understood Mr Marcel planned to build a refrigerated unit in his residential property within which the bodies would be stored.
This would be a temporary measure until an above-ground vault was built.
It is understood Mr Marcel's ultimate intention was to have the bodies of his parents transferred to the West Bank in the Middle East for burial.
Lord Mulholland in February said the city council has a ''statutory duty'' to dispose of the remains.
Commenting on the outcome of the proceedings on Friday, an Edinburgh City Council spokesman said: "We acknowledge the Court of Session's decision and will take the necessary and appropriate steps to bury the bodies."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here