Dogs could be used in the fight against Covid-19 – by being trained to sniff out infected people.
Researchers in Australia have begun the training of 14 dogs in a feasibility study and the animals could become part of the screening process for incoming visitors if successful.
Studies have previously shown dogs can detect particular odours – known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) – which are produced by humans when they are suffering with a viral infection.
Dr Anne-Lise Chaber of the University of Adelaide’s School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences said the current training – in Adelaide and at the Australian Border Force’s National Detector Dog Program Facility – will test the accuracy of dogs detecting VOCs in sweat samples from people infected with coronavirus.
The research will not involve the dogs directly sniffing people who have tested positive.
She said: “Dogs could be deployed in airports and also be used to screen staff in hospitals and travellers in quarantine.”
The most widely used test for Covid-19 is Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which sees a swab taken from a person’s nasal passage or from the back of their throat.
It is then tested to see if the virus’s genetic material, called RNA, is present.
Studies have suggested specialised working dogs can detect Covid-19 VOCs in patients when people are asymptomatic or in the incubation phase, the latter of which may not always be detected via a PCR test.
Research partner Dr Susan Hazel added: “The dog’s nose beats the best current technology in identifying infected people.
“Using a scientific approach to dog training, we hope to increase the number of possible uses for future detector dog work.”
The results from the trials are expected early next year and could lead to further research being carried out in the community, the researchers said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here