A new study has been launched to consider how the fear of coronavirus has impacted the lives of people aged over 50.
Elaine Douglas, a lecturer in global ageing at the University of Stirling, has been awarded £712,000 from the Economic and Social Research Council, as part of UK Research and Innovation’s response to the virus.
She will use the funding for an 18-month study, called “The impact of Covid-19 Fear: evidence to inform social, health and economic recovery”.
It is said to be the first study of its kind to measure the extent of how Covid has impacted everyday lives.
Dr Douglas said: “Covid-19 has affected the way in which people connect, look after their health, work and spend.
“However, little is known about the role that Covid-19 fear plays in how people go about their everyday lives, particularly among older people, who are arguably most vulnerable to poor outcomes.
“Our research will look at how people re-engage with society over the year ahead and provide insights for policy and public health messages.”
Surveying people aged 50 and over in Scotland, the study will establish how the pandemic is influencing decisions to socialise, visit family and attend medical appointments.
It is part of a new wave of the Healthy Ageing in Scotland study, set up by Dr Douglas and economist Professor David Bell.
The pair will work on the project alongside other social science and health psychologist colleagues at the university, with initial data due to be published this summer.
Dr Douglas added: “This research will provide insight into how people can be supported back into everyday activities.
“It will provide important information for the NHS on how to support those with Covid-19 fear to attend hospital appointments, cancer screenings or other health-related appointments.
“It will also give an idea of people’s willingness to return to the ‘physical’ workplace, to go shopping again, or to meet friends in restaurants.
“These activities are significant for our individual wellbeing as well as our economic recovery.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here