Broadcaster David Dimbleby has criticised Boris Johnson’s “attacks” on the BBC, calling them “dangerous”.
The former Question Time host, 81, also said he disapproved of BBC presenters who get paid for outside appearances.
He told The Times: “I am very dismayed by the Johnson attacks on the institution. I think they are crowd-pleasing. I think they are quite dangerous. I don’t think they will work.”
He added: “Margaret Thatcher always had it in for the BBC but she wasn’t trying to destroy it … A lot of people who support Johnson also quite like the BBC. I don’t know what is going on in his mind. I think it’s quite frightening.”
On BBC presenters who get paid for appearances outside the corporation, he said: “If you present the news you shouldn’t go off and earn 20 grand for chairing a paint conference.”
Dimbleby said the Question Time panels got “less impressive” as “a lot of politicians … gradually refused to come on” and think, “‘What’s in it for me?'”
But “it’s their duty to explain what they are doing … To say when you get to the top, ‘I am not going to be interviewed’, like Boris Johnson did at the last election, is so arrogant … It doesn’t make you a shrewd operator. It erodes the democratic process,” Dimbleby said.
Of Downing Street chief adviser Dominic Cummings, he added: “He’s like a machine gun … Shrinking the BBC, getting rid of all the senior people in the civil service, attacking the judiciary … You don’t achieve anything just by attacking them all.”
His comments follow reports that Downing Street wants to axe the TV licence fee and fund the BBC through viewer subscriptions.
The Sunday Times previously quoted a senior Downing Street source as saying: “We are not bluffing on the licence fee … We will whack it.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel