Large animals like elephants travel more slowly because they can not keep cool, a study has suggested.
Whether an animal is flying, running or swimming, its travelling speed is limited by how effectively it sheds the excess heat generated by its muscles, researchers found.
How far an animal can travel dictates where – and how far – it can migrate, find food, mate and spread into new territories.
This becomes even more challenging in a human-dominated world with increasingly fragmented habitats and limited food and water resources under climate change, the study suggested.
Alexander Dyer, from the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) and the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, and colleagues developed a model to look at the relationship between animal size and travelling speed.
They used data from 532 species.
While larger animals should be able to travel faster due to their longer wings, legs or tails, the researchers found medium-sized animals typically have the fastest sustained speeds.
According to the scientists, this is due to the fact that larger animals require more time to get rid of the heat their muscles produce while moving so they must travel more slowly to avoid overheating.
The team concluded that any animal’s travelling speed can be explained by jointly considering how efficiently it uses energy and sheds heat.
Mr Dyer said: “The new study provides a way to understand animal movement capacities across species and can be used to estimate any animal’s travelling speed based on its size.
“For example, this approach can be applied to predict whether an animal might be able to move between habitats fragmented by human development, even when the details of its biology are unknown.”
Last author Dr Myriam Hirt from iDiv and the University of Jena, added: “We anticipate that large animals are potentially more susceptible to the effects of habitat fragmentation in a warming climate than previously thought and therefore more prone to extinction.
“But this needs further investigation.”
The findings are published in the Plos Biology journal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here