Patients who are given lung transplants are to be given “skin patches” from their donor to help medics spot organ rejection faster.
Scientists are investigating whether these patches can be used as an “early warning system” to identify lung rejection.
Experts said that skin rejects earlier than other organs and can be easily seen at all times.
If a rash appears on the skin patch – which is surgically inserted into the skin of a patient’s forearm – it indicates rejection, which will help doctors to try and prevent the lung from also rejecting.
As well as spotting rejection, it is also hoped that the skin patches will help medics work out when the transplanted organ is working as it should.
Scientists hope that eventually the use of the skin flaps will reduce the number of hospital visits and tests for patients and could even help to guide reductions in immunosuppressant drugs – the medicine taken after a transplant to dampen down the body’s immune system to stop it attacking the “foreign” organ.
It is expected that 152 patients will be recruited to the £2 million Sentinel trial over the next three years.
The study follows success in a similar trial for patients who received intestinal transplants. Researchers found that skin displayed a visible rash between one and 10 days before the transplant was rejected.
They also found that patients who received skin flaps from their donors had a much lower rate of organ rejection.
The latest trial is being run by the Surgical Trials Units at the University of Oxford in collaboration with NHS Blood and Transplant.
The transplants will be carried out by the lung transplants teams at specialist cardiothoracic centres across England.
Patients involved in the trial will receive a skin patch from the forearm of the organ donor, measuring at 10cm by 3cm, which will be transplanted onto the under-surface of the patient’s forearm by a plastic surgeon at the same time as the lung transplant.
Fiona Ballantyne is on the waiting list for a lung transplant after being diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension in 2019.
The 56-year-old, from Camelon, Falkirk, applied to join the trial and said that if it is a success it would be a “momentous moment for transplant recipients”.
She added: “The opportunity to potentially be able to see if your organ is rejecting just by looking at your arm is huge for those of us who are facing transplants.
“Not only because of the fact we could receive treatment earlier than if we didn’t have the patch but also for the peace of mind it would offer, being able to consult the skin patch whenever we feel under the weather.”
Adam Alderson, 44, from Wensleydale, received a skin graft as a part of a multi-organ transplant in 2015, which helped identify signs of rejection.
He added: “Rejection is one of an organ recipient’s biggest fears. Being able to quickly and easily identify if any rejection is occurring is an incredible thing to be able to do, so if the trial is successful and it can potentially work for a large number of transplant recipients, it could be groundbreaking.
“My abdominal wall graft has shown rejection three times, allowing it to be quickly treated.
“It’s a really comforting thing to have – I feel safer knowing that I have a tool available to tell if something is going wrong before it becomes too serious. It’s almost like an oil warning light on your car.”
Henk Giele, chief investigator and associate professor of plastic, reconstructive, transplant and hand surgery at University of Oxford, said: “Lungs are prone to rejection due to their exposure to outside air and high propensity to infection.
“It is often difficult to know if a reaction is caused by infection or rejection as they look the same at the early stages, but the treatments for each are completely opposite.
“It’s for this reason that we have focused the Sentinel trial on the lungs – a visible warning system like this is crucial for all transplants, but especially those with higher rejection rates.”
Emma Lawson, research lead at NHS Blood and Transplant, said the organisation was “honoured” to support the trial by “matching suitable patients for the retrieval and transplant and via our specialist nurses in organ donation, who will work with the generous donor families to secure the extra consents needed”.
– The study is being funded by a Medical Research Council (MRC) and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) partnership.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here