Nestle’s shareholders have struck down a proposal which could have seen the KitKat and Nescafe maker reduce its reliance on unhealthy foods and cut back on the use of salt, sugar and fats.
The company had argued that there is “nothing wrong” with people enjoying “indulgent products” in moderation.
Some 88% of shareholders voted against the proposals, while 11% voted in favour, during the group’s annual general meeting (AGM) in Switzerland on Thursday. About 1% abstained from the vote.
Nestle was facing pressure from shareholder activists through a coalition led by responsible investment charity ShareAction.
The charity’s deputy chief executive, Simon Rawson, said: “While the majority of shareholders did not support the resolution, we hope that it has encouraged them to think about the public health impacts of their investments.”
The coalition was challenging Nestle to change its sales targets in order to promote healthier eating among consumers.
Its proposal would have seen the company report sales figures for food and drinks according to how healthy they are, based on internationally accepted standards of nutrition.
It also wanted Nestle to set targets to increase the proportion of sales that come from healthier products.
But the notion was rejected by the group’s shareholders who were able to vote on it during the AGM.
Nestle said that ShareAction was “targeting the wrong company” with the campaign, as it was already making progress with its health goals where other food manufacturers are not.
It also argued that setting targets on nutritious food sales would mean weakening other segments in its food and drink portfolio, which would allow rivals to step up who were less focused on healthy eating.
ShareAction’s Mr Rawson said: “While the vote we achieved today may be less than we wanted, the direction of travel is clear.
“Investors and consumers are recognising the importance of addressing the business risks and public health impacts of an industry that is heavily reliant on the sales of unhealthy food.
“They have growing expectations not only from Nestle but from all food manufacturers.”
He also argued that because the proposals required Nestle to amend its own rulebook, this element deterred some shareholders from voting in support of the notion.
More than 1,000 of Nestle’s shareholders attended the AGM in person.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel