An Israeli offensive in Rafah would be “catastrophic”, Labour’s shadow foreign secretary has warned, after the Israeli military told Palestinians to leave parts of the southern Gazan city.
The announcement appears to signal that a long-threatened Israeli ground invasion is imminent, and came as ceasefire talks appeared to have stalled.
Israel had previously paused its plan to attack Rafah, which it says is the last significant Hamas stronghold, to allow for negotiations over the release of Israeli hostages by the militant group.
Defence minister Yoav Gallant on Sunday claimed Hamas was not serious about a deal and said his government was preparing “a powerful operation in the very near future in Rafah”.
A deadly rocket attack by Hamas from Rafah on Sunday against Kerem Shalom, one of Israel’s main crossings for delivering assistance, may have spurred Israel’s latest move.
Its army told thousands of people to evacuate eastern Rafah to what Israel has designated a humanitarian zone on the Mediterranean coast, while Israeli strikes overnight reportedly killed at least a dozen people.
The Israeli Defence Forces said the temporary evacuation is “limited in scope” and “and not a wide-scale evacuation of Rafah”.
Western nations and humanitarian organisations have urged Israel not to carry out the offensive in Gaza’s southernmost city, where hundreds of thousands of people have taken refuge during the seven-month war.
Labour’s David Lammy said on X on Monday: “An Israeli offensive in Rafah would be catastrophic. It must not go ahead.
“We need an immediate ceasefire, the immediate release of hostages, and immediate unimpeded aid to Gaza.”
Lisa Nandy, shadow international development minister, joined Mr Lammy’s calls, saying the people in Rafah “have nowhere else to go”.
A spokesperson for the charity ActionAid said: “Forcing over a million displaced Palestinians from Rafah to evacuate without a safe destination is not only unlawful but would lead to catastrophic consequences.
“Our aid workers are reporting some of the most severe conditions in recent memory with widespread disease, starvation and chaos.
“Let us be clear, there are no safe zones in Gaza.
“The international community must act swiftly to prevent further atrocities and hold themselves as well as the Israeli government to account – if an invasion of Rafah is your ‘red line’ will you do everything possible to stop this imminent attack?”
Madeleine McGovern, humanitarian advocacy adviser for aid organisation Care International UK, said: “The UK Government must act urgently to prevent an expansion of military operations in Rafah, which would place 1.5 million men, women, and children sheltering in Rafah at unacceptable risk.
“Ministers cannot delay any longer before suspending licenses for arms sales to Israel.
“It would be unconscionable for British made weapons to be used in an assault on Rafah.
“A large-scale military offensive in Rafah presents a significant risk of serious harm to families and communities.
“There is simply nowhere safe to go in Gaza and international law is clear.
“Civilians in Rafah, already exhausted and starving, must be protected.”
Islamic Relief warned that al Mawasi, the coastal area to where Palestinians have been ordered to move, is not safe.
“Civilians sheltering there say they continue to face attacks and severe shortages of food, water and other vital aid.
“Forcing more people there will make the humanitarian crisis even worse.”
The Israel-Hamas war was triggered by Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people and saw another 250 being taken hostage.
Israel’s offensive in Gaza has killed more than 34,700 people, according to the local health ministry, and swathes of the population are on the brink of starvation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel