Care home staff felt “second best” during the Covid-19 pandemic compared to NHS workers who were prioritised for PPE and benefitted from special shopping hours, an inquiry has heard.
Duncan McDonald, a house manager at Erskine Home in Bishopton, Renfrewshire, during the pandemic, told the Scottish Covid-19 inquiry that social care had always been the “poor cousin” of the NHS, and that this disparity left his staff feeling underappreciated during the pandemic.
The inquiry heard that NHS workers enjoyed priority access to PPE at the start of the pandemic, and benefitted from schemes like free coffee and special shopping hours, which were not always available to care staff.
Mr McDonald told the inquiry: “Social care’s always been the poor cousin of care. I’ve got friends in the NHS and massive respect to them, especially during what happened, but we felt that we were the second best again.
“At the start, PPE had been redirected to the NHS, so we were struggling to get PPE. I had people in my street out clapping for the NHS every Thursday night.
“Fair play to them, but we had to get letters from our director to say that we worked in social care, could we get into the shops at the same time?
“And even then staff were getting turned away, and it’s embarrassing to get turned away from shops.”
Mr McDonald also told the inquiry about the challenges his team faced during the pandemic.
This included staff being unable to leave the care home during 12-and-a-half-hour shifts, and the difficulty of supporting vulnerable patients, all of whom were suffering from dementia, while complying with guidelines around PPE and social distancing.
He also told the inquiry that his director took the decision to mandate PPE for visitors to the home in February 2020, ahead of the first official lockdown, in order to protect residents from the virus.
He said: “Our director of care quickly realised that, you could see on the news, it was coming, so it was just a matter of keeping the residents safe and the relatives safe, as much as possible.”
The inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here