Sweeping reforms to the Official Secrets Act could criminalise public interest journalism by exposing journalists and whistle blowers to harsh new penalties such as lengthy prison sentences, the News Media Association said today.
Stories that embarrass the UK government could land journalists in prison under proposals being considered.
The Home Office is running a consultation on changes to the 1989 act to bring it up to date and take changes like the digital landscape into consideration.
The new proposals suggest journalists will be treated in the same way as people whp have leaked information or have committed espionage. The changes could see the maximum sentence for journalists reporting on public interest stories raised from two to 14 years.
Responding to the Home Office’s consultation on legislation to counter state threats the NMA warned that proposals for stiffer custodial sentences and widening the scope for prosecuting individuals could open the floodgates to the media and its sources being prosecuted despite acting in the public interest.
The NMA argued a public interest defence should be introduced to the regime to protect freedom of speech the NMA warned that proposals for stiffer custodial sentences and widening the scope for prosecuting individuals could open the floodgates to the media and its sources being prosecuted despite acting in the public interest.
From time to time, it is necessary to adjust the law to maintain a sufficient level of security in response to evolving threats, but the changes must not come at the expense of public interest press freedoms which do so much to expose wrongdoing, the NMA added.
The NMA “vehemently opposes” the proposal to replace the requirement to demonstrate damage in order to bring a prosecution against whistle-blowers or journalists with a “subjective fault element” which could open the regime up to widespread abuse by those seeking to hide embarrassing truths from public view.
“As part of any thriving democracy, the public and a responsible press must be free to shed light on the state’s injustices,” said NMA legal policy and regulatory affairs director Sayra Tekin.
“The proposed measures will deter whistle blowers from coming forward with vital information which the public have a right to know and place a chill on investigative journalism which holds power to account.
“We strongly urge the Government to reconsider these measures and instead work with the industry to place appropriate protections for journalism at the heart of the Official Secrets Act so that freedom of speech is enhanced by the new regime rather than weakened further.”
The Home Office says it is not putting reporters at risk, and they will “remain free to hold the Government to account”.
Law campaigners have recommended introducing a public interest defence to people charged under the Official Secrets Act – the Home office has said it would consider that “in further detail” but hasn’t taken it forward yet.
They are concerned such a defence could “undermine our efforts to prevent damaging unauthorised disclosures, which would not be in the public interest”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article