SCOTTISH Liberal Democrat leader Nicol Stephen's re-election campaign is being bankrolled by a businessman previously investigated for tax fraud and whose firm was described as "cynical and insensitive".
The enterprise minister's local party has accepted nearly £4000 in donations from Aberdeen-based Ian Suttie, who laid off nearly 200 workers at textile firm Richards in 2004 without pay or redundancy money.
Suttie was slammed by an industrial tribunal and later dubbed "irresponsible" by an Aberdeen sheriff after a separate investigation into his tax affairs.
Critics have called on Stephen to make a statement about his links to the entrepreneur, whom the LibDem leader has praised in the Scottish parliament.
The donations were revealed in the Electoral Commission's latest round of financial disclosures.
Stephen's local party in Aberdeen South recently declared £1200 in donations from Suttie, on top of £2400 previously given to the branch.
Suttie, an oil tycoon and one of Scotland's richest men, is a controversial figure due to his role in the closure of the Richards of Aberdeen textile business, which he took over in 2002.
The company collapsed in November 2004 and resulted in 196 workers, some of whom were on the minimum wage, losing their jobs and pensions, with no pay or redundancy.
Employment tribunal chairman Nicol Hosie awarded the staff an average payout of £3500, adding: "Staff were treated in a cynical and insensitive manner."
Unions were incensed after one of Suttie's other firms announced plans to build an "urban village" on the Richards site, leading to accusations that the tycoon had bought the firm as a way of "asset-stripping" it and using it for property development.
Suttie ran into further trouble in 2006 after a tribunal found that his carpet firm, First Textile Flooring, had failed to consult 38 Ayrshire workers about their redundancy. The firm was ordered to pay £160,000 to its former employees.
But the businessman's most serious brush with authority occurred in 2005, when he was accused of fraud by not declaring more than £179,000 in interest in his bank accounts.
The millionaire was cleared by the court but was accused of being "irresponsible" by the sheriff for not checking his bank statements.
The revelations are an embarrassment for Stephen as his local party has accepted a stream of donations from the businessman.
Stephen's role as enterprise minister includes promoting corporate social responsibility. In 2002, he praised the businessman in the Scottish parliament.
Suttie's cash will effectively bankroll Stephen's re-election campaign in Aberdeen South, as Electoral Commission data shows the branch has not received any other registerable donations in the past four years.
The row also brings into focus the links between the LibDems and Aberdeen businessmen with property interests - days before Suttie's most recent handout was declared, the party's neighbouring Aberdeen Central branch declared £7500 in donations from entrepreneur Alan Massie.
Critics say that Suttie's generosity in particular puts LibDem councillors in an awkward position, as they are about to rule on his proposed redevelopment plans for the former Richards site.
Amicus regional officer Graham Tran condemned the LibDems for taking Suttie's cash: "Nicol Stephen should make a statement on whether he has any links to Ian Suttie. For the LibDems to accept this money is outrageous."
A spokesman for Stephen said the payments were above board.
He said: "These donations will, of course, be part of the campaign budget, but it is a thriving local party. Nicol Stephen has no direct responsibility for fundraising in Aberdeen South."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article