YOU know the fight or flight response?
Well, I don’t have the first bit. I’m all flight. I didn’t get where I am today by making a stand. Not me. I leg it. I’m a coward and always have been. It’s instinctive, and I’m happy to acknowledge it. I pay monthly dues to the Amalgamated Union of Fearties and Milksops.
I was cogitating about this recently when I considered that most movies and TV dramas are about heroic people acting bravely. There but for the grace of Buddah go I.
Like everything else in my life, it’s not my fault. Faced with a threat, my brain overloads with chemicals which disable any impulse towards bravery. It isn’t just physical threats. I remember standing in the street with an unhappy girlfriend one evening. We were having a perfectly amicable discussion about my shortcomings when, suddenly, I cut her off in mid-harangue by running away. True story: I legged it down the street.
A detail I remember concerns the fact that, as I disappeared into the distance, she shouted after me: “Toad!” The amphibious allusion was discombobulating. I’d never been called a toad before, certainly not in Leith, where other four-letter appellations were chosen by enemies and teachers. Toad? You’d think I’d hopped down the road making parping sounds.
The fascinating point is this: it was the right thing to do. It got me out of an uncomfortable situation instantly. Same with physical threats: immediately, my eye spots the exit and I exeunt sharpish. You recall, too, the time I fled the social distress of a party, departing via a bathroom window and running on fleet feet through the streets of Portobello.
It was exhilarating and bears out my conviction that cowardice and freedom gang thegither.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article