PUT it this way, you wouldn't like it if someone called you unbalanced.
You might take it as an insult.
Balance is, in some mysterious way that you'll have to work out for yourselves, the key to life. The entire universe is in balance. According to top Taoists, we need to balance our ying and yang, to keep opposing forces interplaying equably. I've never understood how that works with good and evil but, hey, let's not nitpick over minor matters.
You can become physically – as much as mentally – unbalanced, not just in the sense of toppling over, but in your everyday posture, so that you trap energies on your left or right side, or have things up when they should be doon. Most of us manage to stay upright but, often, it's all doonhill from there.
Balance is a supposed shibboleth of the broadcast media but, in practice, it's difficult to maintain. The BBC is, by and large, pretty good at it. But it – along with other channels – has been accused of skullduggery when it comes to debates about independence, where the format has been to have three or four Unionists against one normal person.
This is because they've selected both panel members and audience on the basis of party affiliation and, since most parties in Scotland are evil, there occurs an imbalance in the Tao. Campaigners say the debate organisers must think there are puddles behind our earlobes, and predict that the chicanery will only cease when citizens protest. We'll see.
Balancing the books is another important aspiration. This refers not to the acrobatic skills of librarians shifting tilting piles of tomes but to bringing your credit and debit sides into line. I've never been good at that, but then neither have Britain and America. And some say, on balance, they are heading doonhill.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article