King’s Park in Stirling dates back to the 12th century and is a landscape of inestimable historic and cultural importance, and now it is about to be sold.
If you visit Stirling castle today, you will be impressed at the investment and world class artistic endeavour that has gone into restoring the Great Hall and, most recently, the quite fabulous Renaissance Palace of James V.
Head out onto the terrace overlooking the ancient Royal Park used by the Stuart Kings for hunting and sport, however, and you will find no mention of the important view before you, one of Scotland’s most historic landscapes.
The park is Crown land and currently administered by the Crown Estate Commission (CEC). The Crown Estate in Scotland is currently the focus of intense political debate and next week, the Scottish Affairs Committee of the House of Commons will publish their long-awaited report on the subject.
With such uncertainty over the future of the Crown Estate in Scotland, why has the CEC been allowed to get away with selling Scotland’s most ancient Royal Park for £1 million?
Over the past 50 years the CEC has managed the park as just another part of their commercial rural estate. Which is why, in 2006, it began secret negotiations to sell Stirling Golf Club lands that they already leased.
When news of this private deal broke there was an outcry and Stirling Council stepped in and agreed to acquire the parkland and land at the back of the castle for £600,000, funded with £150,000 from the Stirling Common Good Fund and £450,000 from the golf club (which would then be granted a 175 year lease).
Local residents, in the form of King’s Park Community Council, tried to stop the deal. They wanted to know why on earth land that was already in public ownership was being alienated for 175 years for the golf club, a private organisation.
They also wanted to know why the Stirling Common Good Fund, a reserve established for the benefit of the community, was being raided to pay for this. The community came up with an imaginative alternative proposal that would restore this historic landscape as part of the wider restoration of Stirling Castle, but both the Secretary of Scotland (Jim Murphy) and the Scottish Government refused to get drawn into the argument.
Very soon the deal went cold as the credit crunch hit, but now it is back on the table. Only this time more land (another 92 acres) is included and the price is over £1 million, with the Common Good Fund forking out a whopping £567,000. This represents over 60% of its reserves, and for what?
This land is Crown land. It is Scottish public land. It should be administered by Scottish Ministers, as nearly all other historic castles, palaces and Royal Parks are. No public money should be needed to acquire control of this land, least of all the bulk of Stirling’s Common Good Fund.
This deal robs us all of an important national inheritance. It destroys the opportunity to restore this historic landscape and betrays the Crown Estate Commission as an organisation out for a quick profit at the expense of Scotland’s heritage.
Plans are underway for the 2014 year of Homecoming and the 700th anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn. Why, when Scotland is in the midst of such historic times and opportunities, is the Scottish Government sitting idly by whilst a Common Good Fund is raided to pay for public land that already belongs to us to be given away to a private golf club for 175 years?
It is time to stop this madness.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article