Why does Chris Grayling not want the readers of The Herald to know which companies and organisations are participating in the Coalition Government's Mandatory Work Activity scheme and other work experience programmes?
Since January this newspaper has been requesting the names of those providing placements in Scotland. Initially we were told the information was commercially confidential, even though similar lists have been published elsewhere in the UK under Freedom of Information.
Now the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) has conceded that the real reason for withholding the information is the strength of the protest campaign against the controversial schemes, which have been denounced as "workfare", "forced labour" and even "the latter day workhouse".
There is nothing intrinsically wrong with work experience, especially for the young and the long-term unemployed. As many middle and upper-class youngsters lucky enough to land good quality internships have discovered, it can be a vital foot in the door of the jobs market. But it must be designed and operated with the needs of the jobseeker at its core, rather than to provide free labour or displace paid staff.
One of the best ways to put that to the test is to operate transparent schemes, open to outside scrutiny. If these programmes are as useful as the DWP would have us believe, why not invite journalists to look at them and interview participants? The department's coyness suggests it is running scared.
At a conference today, entitled Tapping into Talent, Mr Grayling, the Employment Minister, will attempt to restore confidence in the Government's back-to-work programme, after some employers have backed out of mandatory placements and as others reconsider their position. (It sends a negative message to a potential employer, if a person's only work experience has been forced on them.)
No compulsion or welfare privatisation can disguise the fact that there are not enough jobs to go around. A particular problem with these initiatives at the moment is that they coincide with parents in low-paid part-time work losing tax credits if they work less than 24 hours a week. They are having to compete for extra work with thousands of unpaid temporary workers on Government programmes.
If big companies believe they are doing something socially useful by participating in these schemes, they should have the guts to put their heads above the parapet and open themselves for inspection. That is why The Herald is appealing to the Information Commissioner against this unfair ruling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article