Since the 1950s, in my lifetime, at Faslane and Coulport, arsenals of nuclear weapons and ill-managed nuclear submarine facilities have threatened the health and environment of all Scotland (Revealed: blueprint for a nuclear-free Scotland two years after independence, News, June 17).
There are many positive reasons to vote for independence. Perhaps one of the most inspiring is to allow Scotland to develop its vision as a world leader in alternative energy technology. We can also be proud of the humanity and open internationalism of the current Scottish Government, which would surely flourish as an independent member of the UN and – we can hope – would advocate alternatives to current diplomacy based on weapons of mass destruction within a planet we are currently polluting to death.
But, when I vote for independence, it will be simply on the basis of these experiences and because I want an independent Scottish government – with control over defence and foreign representation – to think global – but also to make sure that the land and sea in this country – not to mention our young soldiers – are no longer abused in the name of a so-called "UK defence policy", which is, in fact, a continuing, incomprehensible disaster.
Frances McKie
Evanton, Ross-shire
Hard on the heels of the welcome report in the Sunday Herald regarding the speed at which an independent Scotland could rid itself of Trident comes the astonishing announcement that the UK Government is to splash out £1 billion of our money on two new submarine reactor cores, while maintaining the fiction that no decision on renewing Trident will be made until 2016, a further illustration of the contempt in which Scotland, her people, her parliament, her churches and trade union movement, all of whom are opposed to Trident and its residence in Scottish waters, are held by David Cameron and his Tory ministers. Not to mention the utter irrelevance of the LibDems in the so called "Coalition" Government.
Ruth Marr
Stirling
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article