I know some unfortunate people who lament the first signs of autumn, seeing only death and decay in the turning of leaves from green into gold.
But not me. I positively embrace the falling of crispy orange leaves as they unlatch themselves from the branches of beech, sycamore, lime, oak, hawthorn, ash, and rowan trees. Far from thinking of them as spent and lifeless, to me these colourful discards are full of bounce, vitality and promise.
Think of the underfoot crunch as you walk through a misty street or forest, and the woody smell they emanate in the damp. Think of their usefulness as mulch in the winter garden, giving shelter to all sorts of lively bugs and plant roots. Those that fall intact can be slipped between the pages of heavy books to re-emerge in spring, almost forgotten, as things of skeletal wonder. And before all this, their brief but spectacular show of reds, yellows and ochres before their sifting descent into earthy brownness. After months and months of unremitting green, this stimulating visual ballet convinces me that there is life after death after all.
But what about the bare trees that are left behind, moan the autumn naysayers, don't they look sad? Maybe. But not for long, if you see them as magnets for hungry winter birds and deck them with feeders stuffed with nuts. If you look closely enough you can see the marks where, before too long, buds will appear to announce the advent of spring.
Before you accuse me of being the irritating type of optimist who always sees the autumn leaf as half-green, there is one type I dislike. That would be the wet, slippery kind that, unseen in the teeming rain, caws the feet from under you and plops you, red-faced, in a puddle.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article