CALUM Stewart presents legal opinions on pro-EU membership of an independent Scotland (Letters, November 1).
He cites Graham Avery as saying that Scotland's population have acquired rights as EU citizens having been members for 40 years and would therefore not be asked to leave it. I feel certain that the logic and indeed legal argument is not so simple.
I agree with Mr Stewart that the fuss over the First Minister's advice question/answer has detracted from the main issues at stake.
I thought I had acquired rights as a citizen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and my ancestors have had them, in its various forms, for hundreds of years yet some people are determined to ask me to give them up.We seem to have one membership rule for the UK and another for the EU.
If Mr Stewart and his experts' opinions are correct then a referendum question "should Scotland be independent" has to have the small print appended –" but if you vote yes remember you will still be a part of that other union – the EU – and have to abide by their many directives".
It appears to me that the entire question of giving up one established union and hanging on to another is an issue which must be settled long before a vote is cast.
Catalonia goes to the polls on November 25 and the independence rallies there display a passion which reveals they are serious about independence from Spain. Artur Mas, the political leader of the wealth-producing Catalonian region of Spain has already been reported as suggesting that if they have a referendum the wording should be " Do you want Catalonia to become a new state within the EU? "
Bill Brown,
46 Breadie Drive, Milngavie.
THE letters you published on October 31 preceded a vote in the Westminster Parliament concerning the budget of the EU. It was noticeable in the comments from Edward Roe and Iain A D Mann that no mention was made of the net contribution made by the UK to the financially rapacious EU. For internationalists like me who work with Chinese, Russian, African and Indian Subcontinent citizens amongst others, as well as those of EU extraction, the EU appears to be no more than an expensive specialist club. And it is a club used to beat those who cannot join the merry-go-round.
The Little Europe mentality as portrayed by some of your correspondents claims to be internationalist in approach. It is nothing of the sort; it is based on antipathy to France and Germany. The original enterprise (a coal and steel union) was set up to stop those two countries going to war. The EEC, as joined by those voting in the UK referendum in the early 1970s, then morphed into something unrecognisable. We now have the absurd position of an independent Scotland that is immediately subsumed by a European superstate. Thus, despite the poverty (often of expectation) present in Scotland and the rest of the UK, all the wealth generated by oil, gas, other energy sources and fisheries is going to be handed over to the EU. And all this at a time when councils, police and other public bodies here are having resources cut. Are we truly expected to believe that increasing the budget for the EU is value for money? And an independent Scotland is going to be signed up for this with not a mention of how big the premium for club membership is likely to be.
Dr Ronnie Gallagher,
5 Wyndhead Steading,
Lauder.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article