The benefits of the Borders rail project are grossly exaggerated ("Green light for £348m rail project as new deal signed", The Herald, November 7).
Only one job per £900,000 of capital expenditure will be provided. If the money was spent building public housing, many times more jobs would be generated and over several areas where unemployment and housing needs are acute. Rail construction involves mainly heavy machinery, not manpower.
That many cannot afford to live in Edinburgh does not mean they need move to the Borders. There is plenty of land in Midlothian, within 10 miles of central Edinburgh, where house prices are no higher than in the Borders while travel times and costs are much lower.
An annual ticket to/from Galashiels would cost more than £2000 at present fare levels. Few could afford that. The line will serve only a relatively affluent minority but require heavy public subsidy because most trains will be little used. Older people can ride free on buses so few will use the train.
Most commuters would need to take a bus or a tram between the station and work and their total travel times would be over three hours daily. That is not conducive to health and good family life. It would be far quicker and easier to use a car for the whole trip and that is what most will do.
An annual total of 60,000 peak road trips is only about 120 per workday in each direction. A main road can carry about 1200 cars hourly each way so that is only 10% of capacity.
Train times between Tweedbank and Newtongrange will be about the same as for buses, which are far cheaper to run and could easily carry the number of passengers using trains.
Most of the benefits claimed could be gained at less than 30% of the cost by terminating the line at a new station (with a bus interchange) south of Newtongrange and building new homes and offices close to it.
Another possibility is to build a busway on the trackbed rather than a railway. Buses could then use this as part of their route, greatly reducing travel times. In Australia, this has been done in Adelaide, Sydney and Brisbane. It would benefit may more people and at far lower cost than a railway.
John Munro,
68 Buccleuch Street, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article