I read the article on widening access at St Andrews University with some surprise ("University 'demonised' for failing to widen access", The Herald, November 27).
I was prepared to give Stephen Magee, vice-principal of the university, the benefit of the doubt until I heard him expand his views on radio.
I write as a long-standing headteacher of a school serving the very areas which Mr Magee seems to think could do better.
He talks as if education is a level playing field, and that if only schools in deprived areas would do their job properly he would happily admit them, clutching their five Higher passes. The negative effects of poverty are well recorded; the advantages of private schooling with small class sizes or attending state schools in affluent areas both with paid after-school tutors are also well known. Universities do not need to lower standards to take account of students' backgrounds, they need to be smarter and more proactive in working with schools to identify talented pupils who with continued support will flourish at university.
I refer Mr Magee to our own work with the University of Glasgow, another ancient and highly ranked university. We entered into a formal partnership with the university in February, with the full support of the principal, Anton Muscatelli, and the Cabinet Secretary, Michael Russell. While focused on initial teacher education, the other benefits of our work are considerable, and show what a university committed to widening access can achieve.
I have no doubt our connection with Glasgow has already raised pupil aspirations, and will feed through to more of our talented pupils gaining university places. I would further commend to him the excellent top-up scheme supported by all the west coast higher education institutions.
Mr Magee would benefit from talking to forward-looking colleagues at Glasgow who are committed to widening access, rather than recycling out-of-date excuses for inaction.
Stirling Mackie
Headteacher, Irvine Royal Academy, Kilwinning Road, Irvine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article