WHEN I say "a good hood", I don't mean in the modern sense of a district or neighbourhood.
I cannot think the young persons in my Embra suburb count as "kidz in the hood", though there is the odd one, of course. Oddly enough, he's likely to be clad in what I understand is known as a "hoodie", an insubstantial garment that gives the wearer a furtive, medieval look.
No, I have gathered you here today to talk about proper hoods: on substantial anoraks of the sort sold by serious outdoor shops.
This column has waxed lyrical about anoraks before, with a colleague fingering them as a peculiarly male thing. Could be something in that.
It's with shame that I recall how my ex used to have to sort my hood for me. Can't cope with toggles, d'you see? Hate the damned things. Can't get my head round them. And they're supposed to be getting my hood roond ma heid. Best anorak I ever had featured a hood that just fitted your head on the simple but profound understanding that most bonces are roughly the same size. There was nothing with which to fiddle, nothing to draw too tight. It just went on. Marvellous.
Of course, it was soon withdrawn from the market. Nothing lasts nowadays, particularly in fashion, which even extends to anoraks. Lines are discontinued and stuff you might have bought again simply isn't available.
At the time of going to press, I'm thinking of buying an anorak with a snorkel hood. Controversial, eh? These were big in the 1970s.
And, boy, they still look cosy, as well as hiding your coupon from disparaging eyes.
True, you can't really see properly out of them either. But I didn't get where I am today by knowing where I was going.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article