I WAS very sorry to learn of the extremely wounding accusations made about Cardinal O'Brien, especially at this moment in his life and in the current stage of the Catholic Church's history ("Doubt over cardinal's role in Pope vote", The Herald, February 25).
Rank and reputation provide no exemption from accusations of this kind. Nevertheless these particular ones seem out of character with the perception I have of Cardinal O'Brien – a plain-spoken, straightforward man not afraid of expressing views which he feels duty-bound to express whatever the risk to his popularity. Some of the cardinal's pronouncements may seem strident and extreme but that is the character of the man.
What, at this particular moment was the useful purpose of making such a damaging accusation? I would like to re-affirm my respect for Cardinal O'Brien and to wish him well.
Ian Ross,
3 Kenbank Crescent, Bridge of Weir.
ALLEGATIONS first raised five years ago about former Liberal Democrat chief executive Lord Rennard ("Clegg: I knew of Rennard allegations", The Herald, February 25) and now regarding Cardinal Keith O'Brien, Britain's most senior Catholic cleric, have surfaced on the eve of the Eastleigh by-election and the selection process for the next Pope.
One suspects that the timing somehow is not entirely motivated by a selfless desire for truth or justice, but due to machinations behind closed doors.
R Russell Smith,
96 Milton Road, Kilbirnie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article