A FEW years ago, just after I'd come back from a visit to Malawi, I was talking to a South African woman in Glasgow.
We were discussing the aid work being done in Malawi when she said something I've never forgotten. Why, she asked flatly, did Westerners insist on meddling in such a dirt-poor country? Wouldn't it be more honest to leave them to their own devices? Weren't we simply raising false hope?
My reply was along the lines of ... well, don't we have a moral duty to help others? How can anyone sit back and watch so many lives being squandered and left unfulfilled? I remembered what I'd seen in Malawi: the heat, the dust, the endless greenery, the modern buildings in Lilongwe and Blantyre, the remote rural villages that seemed to date from 200 years ago; the friendliness of the people, the children's avid curiosity.
Overseas aid is never far from the political agenda. An opinion poll suggests that seven in 10 of us think Britain spends too much on international aid. Ukip's rise has panicked some Tory MPs into arguing inter alia that such funds should no longer be ring-fenced. Enter Tony Blair, and good for him – defending our spending on international aid, and reminding us that the 2005 Gleneagles G8 summit was a success. Its positive legacy is still echoing across Africa, he argues. The proportion of Africans living in extreme poverty is down by nearly 10%. Many fewer children now die before their fifth birthday. UK aid alone has helped five million more children attend primary school. Effective governance and economic growth were prioritised at the time, too, with notable success.
The picture is complicated, of course. Zambian economist Dambisa Moyo has argued that development assistance is a cause of Africa's persistent poverty. And it's unclear as to how many of the successes can be attributed to Gleneagles. Bob Geldof, however, insists that the cancelling of African debt and the doubling of aid in 2005 sparked an "intellectual stampede": the continent now has the world's fastest-growing middle-class and seven of the world's 10 fastest-growing economies.
Foreign investment is booming. War, famine and dictators have become rarer, to quote an Economist survey. Yes, vast poverty remains. But a considerable start has been made. Aid – your money and mine – played a part in that.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article