THE world has come to expect the unexpected from the North Korean regime.
But even by its own brutal and bizarre standards the announcement of the execution of leader Kim Jong-un's uncle, Jang Song Thaek, was extraordinary. It is a dangerous time to be an elite in North Korea, just as it was in the mid-1990s.
A purge is under way and intelligence analysts around the region and in the West are desperately trying to decipher what all this means. Perhaps the most pressing question is whether Kim acted out of fear his uncle was building a rival force inside the regime, or strength, consolidating the power he has amassed over the past two years.
Amid all the speculation, one thing is certain. Kim's ruthless disposal of Jang Song Thaek has grave implications not only for North Korea, but also its neighbours and the United States. This chilling demonstration is Kim's way of telling the world he is his own man. When next the international community is pressed to launch negotiations or diplomatic initiatives with Pyongyang, it is Kim alone it will have to deal with.
For that reason, it would not be a surprise if the young leader launched another missile or generated some form of agitation. Such action would not only undermine the Chinese - who relied on Jang as their point of contact inside North Korea - but also serve to force internal unity in the wake of the purge.
As the year draws to a close the world has no shortage of flashpoints. Events in North Korea have only added to the list. It has always been far too easy to dismiss this secretive communist nation as little more than a basket-case state. Kim Jong-un has revealed just how deadly serious his regime is. The international community is wise to be on its guard.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article