One of the most painful jobs any journalist ever undertakes is speaking to and interviewing the loved ones - the mothers and fathers, children and partners - of ordinary men and women who have died in tragedies.
Often, these are tragedies so stark, so inexplicable, that they are seared into the global consciousness of humankind with one word, the location: Lockerbie, Dunblane, Omagh, Hungerford.
The families of the lost are more often than not frozen in time from the moment of their loss. Often, they lose themselves in the shelter of campaigning - fighting for peace in the case of Omagh, for a ban on handguns after Dunblane, a ban on assault weapons after Hungerford, and with Lockerbie, for the simplest of things: the truth about why loved ones died and who killed them.
Dr Jim Swire was the gentle, noble, fatherly face of the British Lockerbie families. He lost his daughter Flora when Pan Am 103 was blown out of the sky. For 25 years, he has ceaselessly campaigned for the true facts of the bombing to see the light of day. While a lot has emerged, so much is still locked away from public sight. Today, Jim Swire is stepping back from his fight.
As a human being he has taken a brave and wise step. Grief never dies, but sometimes self-torment must. Swire will never forget his daughter, and her name will live on because of his dedication to her memory, but for this strong and noble man, who is now 77, to eke a little joy from the future, he is right to bid the spotlight goodbye. To validate his life, his struggle for Flora and his decision to retire, it must now fall to Britain to do what this man did - seek the truth and bring it to the public eye.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article