The nuclear industry in general, and Dounreay in particular, has a long history of deception.
It has an unenviable record, but we have been told many times that things are better now. We are meant to be in a new era of openness, transparency and trust.
In the light of the revelations of the last few days, this is hard to believe. In a statement to the House of Commons on Thursday, the Defence Secretary Philip Hammond disclosed that the Vulcan naval nuclear reactor near Dounreay had suffered a mishap in January 2012.
Scottish ministers, and the public, were not told about the incident until two years after it happened. Even the official safety watchdogs, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and the Office for Nuclear Regulation, weren't told for months after the event - and were then asked by the MoD not to tell anyone else.
Worse, as we reveal today, the problem at Vulcan caused a tenfold rise in radioactive gas emissions to the environment. This directly contradicts Hammond's assurance to MPs that there had been "no measurable change in the radiation discharge" from the site.
The root of the problem lies in the MoD's historic crown immunity from regulation and prosecution. No other area of public safety policy would accept a situation in which a body responsible for some of the most dangerous nuclear activities on the planet is allowed to quietly regulate itself. Ministers must now question whether it is right for the MoD to remain outwith the law.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article