APART from a couple of minor skirmishes, the Commonwealth Games referendum truce was well observed by the Yes and No camps.
Sensibly so, as few things irritate voters more than politicians attempting to hijack events for their own ends.
That does not mean the Games have been ignored by campaigners, quite the opposite. Before hostilities resume tonight, with the first televised debate between Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling, both sides have been trying to weigh up what, if any, impact the Games have had on the independence battle.
Interestingly, there is not much agreement even within the respective camps on the Games effect. Planning their campaign at the outset, Better Together prepared for a modest boost in the polls for the independence cause in the immediate aftermath of the Games. Some campaign insiders still expect that to be the case but others, seeing Scots' enthusiastic and generous support for English, Welsh and Northern Irish athletes, have revised their view. The focus on the "home nations" has been a great advert for the Union, they believe.
There is a range of opinions in the pro-independence camp, too, with some strategists convinced the undoubted feelgood factor, the mood of confidence and optimism generated by the Games has helped create conditions favourable for a Yes vote. Others are less sure about whether the positive mood will translate directly into votes on September 18.
A Survation poll conducted from last Wednesday to Friday, as Scotland's medal haul was piling up, suggested little change, with Yes on 40 per cent (down a point from the firm's previous poll) and No unchanged at 46 per cent. An Ipsos Mori poll due today will provide further clues as to whether the Games have been a game changer.
It is worth reflecting on before tonight's debate grabs all the headlines and catapults us into the frenetic "short" campaign. The STV showdown marks the start of the final phase of the campaign and by tomorrow all discussion will be about whether it has proved a game changer.
Given the high stakes, both sides have been preparing carefully. Better Together's Alistair Darling has been working at home in Edinburgh with campaign spin doctors and strategists playing the role of Alex Salmond. As part of his preparations, the First Minister has again turned to Claire Howell, the psychology consultant who helped soften his image in the run-up to the 2011 Holyrood election. Both sides are conscious they could win the debate but fail to win over voters if they get the style wrong. February's ill-tempered clash between Nicola Sturgeon and Johann Lamont, also on STV, ended in a nil-nil draw neither camp wishes to repeat.
In terms of their approach, the Yes campaign believes Mr Salmond's high personal approval ratings, along with his formidable reputation in debate, will give him the edge. Better Together, by contrast, wants to de-personalise the encounter and present it as an opportunity to seek answers from the First Minister on an independent Scotland's currency and other issues. The bookies make Mr Salmond clear favourite - but the pollsters will deliver the final verdict in the days ahead.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article