I HAVE read and heard much recently in the media about Aqsa Mahmood, who left Scotland, it is reported, to support the Islamic State, having been "privately educated" ("Anguish of jihadi bride's parents'", The Herald September 4).
I am at something of a loss to understand why this aspect of the young woman's life growing up in Glasgow seems to be getting emphasised. Is it because of surprise that anyone privately-educated should be capable of being influenced to support extreme ideals? There are cases over the years to disprove that notion. Is it because a private education indicates that she comes from a comfortable middle-class home and that one would not expect someone from such a background to pursue the course, which has received so much publicity? The implication of such a perception is that going to Syria to become a jihadi is really a lifestyle move for working-class aspirants only.
When one sees the obvious pain and concern of the two parents, I have the impression that the type of school, which their daughter attended, is of little or no significance as they try to cope with circumstances which they could never have anticipated and are beyond their comprehension.
Ian W Thomson,
38 Kirkintilloch Road,
Lenzie.
I AM a regular reader of The Herald Diary, and normally find its content humorous and suitably tongue in cheek.
However, Thursday's first item ("Playground wars", The Herald, September 4) was in my view an unacceptable low. Most folk of my age are, I suspect, generally puzzled by the enthusiasm of many younger people to share every item of life through tweeting, but we must accept it.
For a newspaper of The Herald's standing to try and make light of a situation which, for a local family, must be unimaginably heartbreaking and incomprehensible, goes beyond the boundaries of good journalism. This item would have been better left out.
Alexander Farr,
21 Caplethill Road,
Barrhead.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article