I FEAR that the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland's laudable exhortation for everyone to come together in a spirit of reconciliation may already be about to founder in troubled waters ("Solemn vow marks intent to co-operate", The Herald, September 22).
The First Minister in his concession speech talked about "holding Westminster's feet to the fire"; and since then, with the strident voices of Tory MPs challenging the Prime Minister's "vow" it is very clear that Lord Smith of Kelvin faces a significant challenge to achieve the cross-party consensus necessary to have the legislation to implement enhanced devolution ready by the end of January, 2015. There is further confusion regarding the long-running West Lothian question with arguments about whether Scottish MPs should be prevented from voting on matters affecting England.
If the enhanced powers for the Scottish Parliament are not delivered on time, the new First Minister of Scotland will cry foul and challenge the validity of the No outcome of the referendum. Such an outcry, which would almost certainly command overwhelming public support, could well precipitate a re-run of the referendum and I am in no doubt that, helped by my vote and thousands of others, Yes would win.
Ronald J Sandford,
1 Scott Garden, Kingsbarns.
I ASSUME that the readings at the service of reconciliation at St Giles did not include Ezekiel 37 verse 22: "And I will make them one nation ... they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms."
David SW Williamson,
49 Pinnaclehill Park, Kelso.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article