An Old Firm fixture is always likely to focus the mind on some of the old problems of football, and so it is no surprise that the upcoming game between Celtic and Rangers has reignited the debate about sectarianism and whether enough is being done, by the Scottish Government and the clubs, to tackle it.
The charity Nil by Mouth believes the answer is no. The charity, which campaigns against sectarianism, has accused the football authorities and the Scottish Government of failing to act. In particular, the charity is disappointed at the lack of progress in implementing, or even discussing, the recommendations made in last year's Morrow Report.
It is hard not to share in that disappointment. The report, by the Belfast academic, activist and politician Duncan Morrow, included a number of recommendations, some very specific, others less so, on tackling sectarianism in the Scottish game.
But 11 months on, no action has been taken on any of them. The most significant was that clubs should be punished when their fans misbehaved, in the way that some European clubs have been recently after incidents of racism.
But the opposition of the Scottish football authorities to the idea has been clear from the start. Some clubs appear to take the view that they should not be punished for what may be the actions of a few unruly fans.
There were will be many football fans, particularly among the vast majority for whom sectarianism is abhorrent, who will agree with that but this remains a persistent, albeit small, problem in Scottish football and it is likely to persist unless more action is taken at all levels. The Scottish Government's confusing Offensive Behaviour At Football And Threatening Communications Act has demonstrated that you cannot arrest your way of sectarianism. It may be that it is only when there are real consequences for the clubs themselves that change is likely to happen.
Further legislation would not be needed for this to happen: the Scottish football authorities could enact the change tomorrow.
But, in the absence of a lack of will to do so, Nil by Mouth is right to call on the Scottish Football Association and the Scottish Professional Football League to be questioned by MSPs.
It is already clear that punishing clubs is unlikely to solve the problem on its own, as the experience of tackling homophobia and racism in football shows.
Those problems, although by no means eradicated, have been reduced partly by campaigns by government, charities, clubs and players but they cost money and, as Dr Morrow suggested in his report, Scotland's clubs could perhaps do more to finance more projects on sectarianism.
Which of these ideas should be taken forward remains a subject for argument but, at least, there will now be a debate at Holyrood in the coming days.
When he delivered his report last year, Dr Morrow said Scotland was tired of sectarianism and ready for change. It is for the Scottish Government and the men and women who run our national game to ensure that such change happens.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article