The Edinburgh trams fiasco continues to astonish.
The Edinburgh trams fiasco continues to astonish.
Now it has been revealed a report examining the cost of extending the existing line to Leith and then Newhaven will itself cost up to £400,000.
It seems inexplicable that merely assessing a proposal could cost so much, especially in the context of a city which is under pressure to make cuts.
All the options for Edinburgh's trams have already been assessed, numerous times. Surely the cost of running trams as far as Leith and Newhaven has already been considered, when the decision was taken to axe that route from the project? Leith Walk itself has been futilely excavated twice already to prepare for the trams that never came. This is clearly not a new concept.
Some of the parameters may have changed, and new information is available - for example the performance of the existing trams and their passenger numbers - but it is still a huge amount to pay for a feasibility study.
Nevertheless, developing the system further appears to be the only way forward, and realism in costing it is vital.
The chastening experience of the trams so far - £300m over the original budget to deliver only two-thirds of what was envisaged when contracts were signed - is evidence of that. An inquiry into how the budget for the existing route spiralled out of control is already underway.
Critics would rightly be unsparing if the council pressed ahead with extending the tram line without due diligence about the likely cost.
Perhaps any calculations should factor in the reputational cost to the city. Edinburgh's image has been hugely damaged by a series of disasters, not all of its own making, from the woes of the Scottish Parliament, to the property repairs controversy and the Mortonhall baby ashes scandal.
Whatever the cost of extending the trams is estimated to be - £80m is suggested - throwing any more public money at the scheme is going to be a hard sell, which is why much is being made of potential private investment.
But if an up-front investment will protect taxpayers in the future, then so be it. Because there is little doubt this project needs to be built.
While passenger numbers on the existing route have been sufficient, they have not been stellar. For many in the city the tram lines as they currently exist will never be of much use, and many feel there are good alternatives even when travelling to the airport.
The long-term viability of Edinburgh's trams depends on more of the original route being built, with the link through to Leith the bare minimum.
So far the network, has cost at least £776m with interest on loans expected to push the total close to £1bn.
In that context, a suggested £80m to significantly increase the usefulness of the trams may be a bullet worth biting.
The trams are already synonymous with the word "costly". The network has to be expanded if the term "white elephant" is not also to be applied.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article