A FEW years ago I was rather alarmed at reading that there was a proposal to introduce fish DNA into tomatoes in order to extend their shelf life.
As a vegetarian (no fish, flesh or fowl in my diet whatsoever) I am growing increasingly concerned, together with people who don't share my vegetarian views, that our food is being genetically altered by crossing species, and we are not advised of it on the packaging.
As David Stubley writes (Letters, February 12) "to take DNA from fish and force it into maize plants ... is truly absurd". In my case it creates a moral dilemma as I would find myself possibly, unknowingly, eating things which I would not. Gradually, I would go from no maize and tomatoes in my diet to goodness knows what else I could not eat.
The Vegetarian Society is very good at vetting foods which are suitable for its members but if food labelling is to be allowed to omit infcormation alerting us to the presence of fish - or any animal - DNA in fruit and vegetables principally, but also in other foodstuffs, then there is huge concern and people should be made aware of it.
If this practice is to increase then maybe there will come a time when I will become malnourished or, as a last-case scenario, have to starve to death. David Stubley wishes "to know the result of the largest experiment in history ... before it is forced upon us". I heartily agree. We must not be left in ignorance. We are entitled to informed choice.
For me, it is imperative that there is nothing "fishy" about my food.
Thelma Edwards,
Hume,
Kelso.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article