By common consent, the last Labour Government had a questionable record on protecting civil liberties.
The proposal to detain terror suspects for 90 days without charge was rightly dropped, as was the outrageously expensive plan to force citizens to carry ID cards.
However, the current Scottish Government is not perfect on the same vital issue, and there are rising fears that the actions of Police Scotland, in particular, are starting to imperil cherished civil liberties in Scotland.
The government's proposal to give dozens of bodies - from HMRC to Scottish Canals - access to the NHS central register, seems ill-judged and out of step with public opinion.
And the SNP Government's creation of a national police force, with the loss of proper governance arrangements, is fast becoming its most worrying policy.
Not only has Police Scotland authorised officers throughout the country to carry guns on routine patrols, but the industrial use of stop and search deployed by the old Strathclyde force was rolled out nationally.
On the latter policy, it is appropriate that in some circumstances the basic details of individuals should be collected and stored by officers after a search.
If drugs, knives or firearms have been detected, an arrest will inevitably mean that a name, address and date of birth will be taken.
However, a change in practice by Police Scotland has widened the information stored to include people's telephone numbers.
These are being taken not just in cases where illegal items have been found, but after legally questionable "consensual" searches that have yielded nothing.
This policy change was intended to give those individuals frisked in Fife - which is running a stop and search pilot - the opportunity of feedback.
However, the national stop and search IT application was changed so that every officer could, in theory, enter phone numbers collected from thousands of citizens.
And while the Fife pilot ended recently, the practice of collecting and recording phone numbers has continued.
According to the Scottish Human Rights Commission, a better approach for Police Scotland to receive feedback on stop and search would be to hand out a contact number, rather than seek the personal details of those searched.
This would mean that any evaluation would be based on those persons who had chosen to contact the police about their search, rather than individuals handpicked by the force.
Yet again, this episode bears the hallmarks of an over-bearing police force which pushes ahead with controversial changes without consulting key stakeholders.
The reputation of Police Scotland can still be turned around, but the jury is out on whether Stephen House is the right person to lead the transformation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article