WHILE I agree with the academics who wrote that the Government is wrong to cut welfare and leave food banks and other charities to try to cope with the people left in poverty or hunger as a result (Letters, May 30) the government responsible is not the Scottish Government, but the UK Government ; and the proposal to make supermarkets give food they would otherwise throw away to food banks has some merit.
The Scottish Government has no power over the vast majority of welfare policy. The UK Government does. With the re-election of a Conservative government the likelihood of welfare policy changing from one that blames the poorest for their own circumstances and punishes genuine claimants seems slim.
In these circumstances the Scottish Government proposing a law to make supermarkets give away food which they would otherwise throw away is them taking one of the few practical measures they have any power to take to help victims of welfare "reform".
While there are some kinds of foods where eating them even a few days past their us- by date could cause illness (meat, fish, eggs or meals containing them for instance), I've eaten plenty of food from days to over a week past its "best before" or even "use by" dates and not suffered any illness as a result - apples, cereal or nuts kept in a cupboard for instance, or food kept in the fridge.
A well-drafted law could differentiate between different types of food.
A higher minimum wage and provision of sufficient benefits to those in genuine need would be preferable to food banks, but the Scottish Government has no power to do either and the UK Government no inclination to.
Duncan McFarlane,
Beanshields, Braidwood, Carluke.
NEW laws in France requiring supermarkets to redistribute surplus food have prompted debate on whether we should follow suit in Scotland ("Fresh, tasty and hrealthy .. serving up the finest in food waste", The Herald, May 30).
It is good to see the issue of food waste getting attention. However, in truth, similar legal obligations already exist in Scotland. Under our waste regulations, all businesses must apply the waste hierarchy, which prioritises re-use and recycling over disposal. So food businesses should routinely redistribute their edible surplus for human consumption, where it is safe to do so, by law.
Zero Waste Scotland believes our priority should be to avoid wasting food in the first place.
As your leader ("Food for thought on waste we create", The Herald, May 30) points out, this is a complex area, with a number of factors, from lifestyles and consumer behaviour to market demands all at play. But just because it is hard, doesn't mean we shouldn't tackle it.
We work to prevent food waste right through the supply chain, promoting less wasteful practices in manufacturing, in retail and at home.
Schemes like FareShare do amazing work, but their existence is symptomatic of wastefulness throughout the food system. Campaigners are right to point out that relying on surplus to feed those in need is not a truly sustainable solution. We should strive to end both food poverty and food waste, independently of one another, for an environmentally and socially just Scotland.
Iain Gulland
Chief Executive, Zero Waste Scotland, Ground Floor, Moray House, Forthside Way, Stirling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article