I WHOLLY agree with Iain AD Mann (Letters, May 18) that the handling of the farrago surrounding the Pan Am atrocity leaves a stain on both Scotland’s Government and its judiciary. The shredding of prosecution witnesses and forensic evidence at the original trial by the famous defence advocate Richard Keen has long cast doubt over the verdict.
Abolghassem Mesbahi, an intelligence chief reporting to the Iranian president before his defection, confirmed the attack was in retaliation for the Vincennes incident and an Al Jazeera documentary produced by the much-respected investigative reporters Bill Cran and Christopher Jeans backed him up.
In fact the original CIA investigation had believed the motivation was the loss of Iran Air 655 and that Ahmed Jibril, the Syrian head of the PFLP-GC, was the mastermind. It suddenly changed tack when the Gulf War made it essential to keep Iran and Syria on board and the West’s default patsy – Gadaffi's Libya – became the improbable suspect.
Dr Jim Swire of the British victims’ families has long argued the Iranian scenario and it would certainly clear the name of that most unlikely “terrorist”: the late Abdelbaset Ali Mohmend al-Megrahi.
Rev Dr John Cameron,
10 Howard Place, St Andrews.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here