PAUL Hutcheon’s report (Owen Smith: No to Barnett Formula, Labour Leadership Special, July 24) does nothing to clarify the operation of the Barnett formula, although Mr Smith’s quoted comments are partly responsible. His comments relate to the Welsh situation – anyone wishing to follow that up could refer to the Holtham Report on Wales’ funding. Here, we concentrate upon Scotland.
The formula was introduced in 1978-79 by the outgoing Labour government in the shadow of the 1979 independence referendum. With Westminster governments pouring extra money into Scotland in the post-war years to thwart the nationalist threat, by 1979 our per capita advantage over England on the comparable devolved services reached 20%. That was not population-based. However, Barnett laid down that we should receive a straight population ratio of any year-on-year enhancement from central government that England received. That meant the extra we had received would be clawed back, thus: If England had funding of £100, ours would be £120. If England received 5%, they would get £5. We would also get £5, but on our £120, that would be worth only 4%. On a block grant of £25bn, the Barnett squeeze would be £250m.
When the Labour-led coalition came in at “Holyrood” in 1999, it would be a shock to them that our funding was depleted in that way – their solution over their eight years was to short change local authorities which caused a consequential 61% increase in council tax; that increased funding, but the absolute effects of the Barnett formula remained intact. So it is block grant funding that is relevant, not expenditure.
It follows, therefore, that Paul Hutcheon’s claim about Scotland building up a sizeable per head spending advantage over English regions is suspect. Whitehall distributes money to English regions from the same UK taxation source, so in certain cases, cuts may have occurred there. Another explanation could be that immigration in England causing an increase in population, without a corresponding increase in funding.
Regarding Scotland’s extra tax powers from 2017, there are complications for Barnett. As the tax powers come in, from Calman in 2016, and from Smith in 2017, the original tranche of associated tax proceeds would come off the block grant. So the tax we would have got in the block grant will come separately, with no change to the overall situation at that point. To the extent that we are in “credit” in per capita terms, Barnett would still need to operate until such time as we have per capita parity with England. The major question is: How accurate will the Scottish HMRC tax figures be? And when it comes to us increasing our rate of income tax to spend more, would England accept that, considering they think they subsidise us?
Regarding a federal system with needs-based funding – forget it. It could never work with inter-regional jealousies (in England) causing endless discontent. In any event, England virtually has such a system now – we should just let then get on with it, and with Scottish independence, it would be irrelevant.
Douglas R Mayer
Currie
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel