THE chances of a bespoke Brexit deal for Scotland have never looked particularly promising. The UK Government keeps saying it is prepared to listen but the message of its Brexiters has been that a separate deal is out of the question. There are also questions about Nicola Sturgeon’s motives: the suspicion must be that she is suggesting a deal that she knows will be rejected as part of an attempt to manoeuvre towards another independence referendum.
In an attempt to apply some pressure on the issue, the Scottish Government has now published its paper on Brexit and has laid out its case for Scotland remaining in the single market as well as gaining new powers, including on immigration.
There is no doubt the Scottish Government has a mandate to suggest such a plan, more than 60 per cent of Scottish voters having supported remaining in the EU. But the Government paper also lays out a well-argued case for Scotland remaining in the single market.
There are several models from Europe that demonstrate how a separate arrangement for Scotland might work and the paper mentions several of them, including Denmark which is an EU member state even though parts of its territory – Greenland and the Faroe Islands –are outside the EU and the European Economic Area. The paper also mentions the Channel Islands, Liechtenstein and Switzerland, all of which have different arrangements that suit their circumstances.
The Government’s point is that something similar could work for Scotland, and give the economy a boost by attracting businesses interested in tariff-free access to the EU. Given our demographics, it is also vital Scotland has the option of separate immigration arrangements.
It is now up to UK Government to give the plan serious consideration and it is certainly a good start that both sides are willing to listen. The long-term aim of their talks must be a flexible Brexit that works for Scotland and the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel