IT would be hard to disagree with Lord McConnell's submission to the Holyrood Commission that “the immediate thing to do is to strengthen the role of the backbench MSP and create a culture where they know they are there to represent their constituents” (“MSPs must put constituents above party loyalty, stresses McConell”, The Herald, January 16). He also says that “backbenchers should be encouraged to give their first loyalty to the parliament and their constituents, not their parties”.
With the best will on the world, how are MSPs supposed to know and pay attention to what their constituents think? More than half of them are elected by first-past-the-post, which on average struggles to represent half of those who vote in the constituency. The remaining list MSPs 'represent' Party supporters in constituencies so large that one wonders if they ever speak to constituents.
“Encouragement” and “culture creation” are empty words. The only way that will work is if the electoral system ensures that MSPs communicate with their constituents and if they don't, they are removed at the next election. The Single Transferable Vote (STV-PR) method of election is the only one available that can do that and which puts all MSPs on the same footing. This method was specified in the manifestos of three parties that together have a majority in the Parliament. Why don't they get on with it and change to STV-PR in time for the next election?
Thomas G F Gray,
4A Auchinloch Road, Lenzie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel