THE General Teaching Council for Scotland has the important job of maintaining the standards of training required to be a teacher, but these are challenging times for the profession. Most councils do not have the teachers they need and the GTCS has proposed relaxing its entry requirements and allowing those who have proven experience and the academic credentials to be registered in Scotland without necessarily having the appropriate level of teaching qualification.
However, the move has not gone down well with the unions. The Scottish Secondary Teachers’ Association is concerned giving full registration in these circumstances could be the start of deregulation. The EIS also says it has concerns about any dilution of standards.
To some extent, the concerns are understandable given the standards laid down by the GTCS have helped build an impressive cohort of teachers in Scotland. However, in the face of a serious shortage of staff in the classroom, the GTCS is right to look again at its rules and procedures.
In fact, the organisation has been playing catch-up on the issue after losing a 2014 court case concerning a science teacher from England who was prevented from working in Scotland because he did not have a degree. He successfully argued that his professional qualifications were the equivalent of a degree and, faced with the ruling and teacher shortages, the GTCS has decided to look again at its whole attitude to regulation of the profession.
What the new approach must never mean is a relaxation of the standards required of teachers, but a strict interpretation of the rules had not been serving Scotland well. The unions say they are concerned the new procedures are the start of a slippery slope towards deregulation, but what the changes are really about is sending a signal that teachers are welcome to come to Scotland. They will still need the necessary experience, but a more nuanced approach from the GTCS has the potential to help address the teacher shortage, which is good for teachers, pupils and Scotland as a whole as long as the required academic standards are maintained.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel