DAVID Pratt’s article about child refugees (“A shameful, sly decision that betrays child refugees in peril”, The Herald, February 8) is indeed a sad reflection on Theresa May’s priorities – free market capitalism and economic gain far outweighing any social considerations, a mirror image of the Chinese and their insatiable appetite to invest in countries no matter how rotten the government or how poor their human rights record.
And we have Nigel Farage berating the German Chancellor in the European Parliament for apparently putting her country at risk through taking more than one million refugees, surely one of the most compassionate actions imagineable? Mr Farage and President Donald Trump politicise these hapless people in a way that is shameful to a civilised society – let them stand in the refugees’ shoes for just one day and see how they feel.
Unfortunately many find their arguments compelling, they cannot see through the facade to the true individuals they are – hard-faced businessmen whose selfish, uncompassionate ideals hold no place for the weak, the poor and the vulnerable.
Paul Shaw,
20 Argyle Way, Dunblane.
HAVING described the “nightmarish world the UK promised it would help some children escape from”, David Pratt accuses Tory ministers of betraying these children “without the remotest hint of contrition”.
So this is how a hard Brexit Government behaves.
What is more, the Immigration Minister is reported as stating that “all children not transferred to the UK are in the care of the French authorities”. However, according to charity workers these unaccompanied and vulnerable children are living rough under bridges and in the woods in temperatures of -5°C. This is yet more deception from ministers who found themselves in positions of power following the presentation of “alternative facts” during the EU referendum campaign. It seems to come naturally to them.
Mrs May in taking this action is revealing not only her appalling lack of humanity but a foolhardy preparedness to reveal that Brexit equals British Trumpism.
Although I do not believe Scottish independence to be a practical proposition any time soon, we in Scotland must find ways meantime of showing to the world that we do not share the values of Little Britain and are indeed reluctant members of such a Hard-Brexit-Driven Kingdom.
John Milne,
9 Ardgowan Drive, Uddingston.
WITH all respect to your distinguished columnist Iain Macwhirter, I am not sure that I can follow his logic in his article, advising the First Minister to call a second independence referendum “within the next 18 months” (“To stay in EU, Sturgeon must take us out of UK pre-Brexit”).
On the one hand he quite correctly concedes that this would be a risky endeavour despite the recent slight increase in support for independence recorded in the latest Herald poll (“Support for independence surges on hard Brexit vow”, The Herald, February 8) though not exactly a “surge” and still not a clear majority. He also correctly identifies that the First Minister would have a problem explaining why she has abandoned her earlier shrewd promise “not to call a referendum until there was a ‘clear sustained majority’ for one”. He then goes on to conclude his analysis by posing the apparently – in his eyes – rhetorical question: “With a hard Brexit now a certainty do Scots still want to remain in the UK?”
One might as well ask: “Do Scots still want to remain in a post-Brexit EU which would no longer include our main trading partner, namely England?”
While I can appreciate that for tactical reasons the SNP hierarchy may not currently wish to consider this question, it will undoubtedly come up on the doorsteps and in the TV studios in any subsequent referendum campaign – to the disadvantage, I would argue, of pro-independence campaigners.
Ian O Bayne,
8 Clarence Drive, Glasgow.
I AM in full agreement with Alan Fitzpatrick (Letters, February 9) and similarly fed up and weary of the incessant calls for another referendum on Scottish independence. Whatever the outcome of Brexit negotiations the siren call of the SNP will not cease for such to take place on any pretext or excuse. It can be forgiven, in part, as that is the only reason for their creation and existence in the body politic of Scotland.
I rather imagine, although I have not heard it stated, that a certain anniversary date in April 2020 would be the icing on the cake for its dreams and aspirations – namely, the 700th anniversary of the Declaration of Scottish Independence at Arbroath Abbey on April 6, 1320.
John Macnab,
175 Grahamsdyke Street, Laurieston, Falkirk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel