TEACHING is increasingly perceived as an unattractive occupation, according to a leading union. Would-be recruits are put off by unsatisfactory routes to advancement, heavy workloads, and an uncompetitive salary scale. Meanwhile, existing teachers are looking elsewhere and seeing that their skills are transferable
The president of the Scottish Secondary Teachers’ Association, Euan Duncan, says other professions can offer more opportunities, and teaching in other countries can also offer better prospects. A shortage of suitable promoted posts is driving a crisis in recruitment, he claims. There is surely some truth in this.
Two developments – the closure seven years ago of the Chartered Teacher programme and the increasing reliance on a faculty structure in schools – have made the options for ambitious teachers problematic. Whereas a role as a principal teacher in their given subject once gave classroom teachers an obvious route to more responsibility and recompense, the fashion for grouping subjects into faculties has been counterproductive.
Brought about for primarily financial reasons, it has seen senior teachers in charge of groupings of subjects in which they may not themselves have expertise. Some teachers see such posts as too big a step-up, but there are also fewer posts, for those who do seek them. Meanwhile, the chartered teacher scheme, designed to enhance the pay of the best teachers while keeping them in the classroom, was discarded.
If these changes had been driven by educational goals, it would be easier to understand. But the benefit of faculties, apart from in cost terms, is hard to discern. And while there were criticisms of the chartered teacher scheme nothing else has been put in its place.
Local authorities face major financial challenges. But if the Scottish Government is truly to address the attainment gap, raise standards in the education system, and prevent a teacher recruitment crisis, it could be time for a wholesale review of career paths and remuneration in our schools.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel