YOUR front-page article "Winds of change: power giant goes 100% green " (The Herald, October 17 seems to have fallen for Scottish Power’s spin on its decision to sell off its gas and hydro plants. Reading the detail of the decision, the company will still supply its customers with electricity from non-green sources if its wind power fails to generate enough power – for example, on non-windy days. So, it is not 100 per cent green. In fact, if that were its intention why did it sell its hydro plants? These would have given it a balance between two green sources – wind and hydro and made it less likely for it to have to turn to non-green sources to keep customers supplied. One is forced to conclude that the company’s decision was made for purely commercial reasons which were dressed up as environmental for the press.
For us to achieve carbon-free electricity generation we need to have a national plan which will invest in creating the correct mix of different sources – wind, tidal, wave, hydro, solar, nuclear and storage technologies so we can always balance our sources of supply with our demand. I believe this will only be possible with a nationalisation of the power generation companies. At the moment power generation is in private hands with each generating company making decisions based on their own commercial needs. This has, for example, led to a rush to adopt more and more wind power without considering the risk that over reliance on this one volatile green source means that we are ever more likely to face a situation where we cannot balance supply and demand thus leading to power cuts. Only by having power generation owned by the nation can we look at the overall mix of generation and make the investment decisions required to balance the system.
Kenneth Brown,
16 Turnhill Drive, Erskine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel