AND so it continues. The endless complexities involved in dragging the UK out of Europe mean that Theresa May’s longed-for breakthrough will probably not materialise in time for a special EC Brexit summit at the end of the month. The road-block over the Irish border backstop has proved too fiendish an impasse. Pro-Brexiteer Penny Mordaunt’s warning that May will fail to have any deal nodded through by the Cabinet unless it is “going to deliver on the referendum result” merely heaps further pressure on May.
Are we getting closer to No Deal, and all of the huge challenges that will pose for May or, conceivably, a new Prime Minister?
No wonder that business is losing patience. Terry Sargeant, who heads the British operation of the huge German concern, ThyssenKrupp, speaks of a “complete shambles” and accuses the Conservatives of making decisions not for business but “to prevent an implosion in their own party.”
At which point, enter Gordon Brown. His call for a second referendum means that three living former Prime Ministers now feel this way, the others being John Major and Tony Blair. No David Cameron as yet, note. Brown also believes that if Britain has to leave the EU, there is a strong chance of it returning to the fold.
Brown suggested a people’s royal commission to devise an alternative Brexit plan. He voiced fears that many have already expressed, that the bruising Brexit experience has resulted in a divided country. In place of the usual royal commission, which could drag on for years, he proposed a commission of the people, “designed to enable, encourage engage and empower voices and concerns over the way ahead.” It would be a “national conversation” that could help re-unite us.
His plan may never see the light of day, but he has performed a useful service in calling for urgent action to halt a descent into further toxic rancour. We would do well to heed his words.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel