Controversial Colombian president who attempted to end civil war
Born: February 4, 1923;
Died: December 7, 2018
BELISARIO Betancur, who has died aged 95, was the former Colombian president whose bold efforts to reach a peace deal with leftist rebels in the 1980s were undone by drug-fuelled bloodletting and an explosion of violence backed by state security forces.
Mr Betancur, who governed from 1982-1986, died in a Bogota clinic after suffering kidney problems.
Uniquely in Colombia's elite-dominated political landscape, Mr Betancur was not the son of patriarchs but instead rose to the pinnacle of power from a modest start as the son of a poor farmer in western Antioquia state. With the aid of scholarships, he earned a law degree and throughout his political career held his own as a journalist, economist and poet.
His arrival to the presidency in 1982 sparked a wave of enthusiasm that he could deliver Colombians from an armed conflict raging since the 1960s that would go on to claim more than 250,000 lives and drive millions from their homes.
He moved quickly to negotiate a truce with guerrilla groups, defying members of his own conservative party and with an everyman's touch began selling his plan for peace directly to Colombians.
But those efforts quickly unravelled as thousands of members of the Patriotic Union - a fledgling political movement tied to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia - were gunned down by right-wing groups. Later it would be discovered that many of the killings were backed by state security forces.
Another rebel movement, the Cuban-inspired M-19, accused Mr Betancur of treason for going back on his peace pledges and in 1985 took control of the country's supreme court with the goal of holding a revolutionary trial against the president.
The heavy-handed response by Colombia's army was not in coming. What Colombians almost universally refer to as the "holocaust" played out in the capital's main square as a blaze consumed the night sky after troops backed by tanks and bombs stormed the Palace of Justice.
More than 100 people were killed, including 11 of the 24 magistrates of the high court, although years later authorities would discover that some of the rebels and suspected civilian sympathisers were taken alive from the building by the army and disappeared.
Mr Betancur's actions during the siege were called into question, including his refusal to take a phone call from the court president pleading for negotiations, as well as a government order forcing TV networks to interrupt coverage of the standoff and broadcast a football match instead.
Barely a week later, another disaster would strike: the eruption of the Nevado del Ruiz volcano, which triggered a cascade of mud that buried the entire town of Armero, leaving more than 25,000 people dead.
It was the worst natural disaster in Colombia's history and once again Mr Betancur was questioned for not having ordered an evacuation in time.
The twin tragedies forever tarnished Mr Betancur's legacy and when he left office in 1986 he largely kept out of public view. For years he maintained that he had lost control of the palace siege to his generals.
The former president was absolved of wrongdoing by a congressional investigation at the time.
But he broke his silence in 2015, showing remorse for his actions as then president Juan Manuel Santos was negotiating with the FARC another peace deal - this time one ending the conflict.
"If there were mistakes that I made," he said, "I ask my compatriots for forgiveness."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here